Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• In reply to: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• Next in thread: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Nielsen Linus (ext) wrote:

> > Is the mod loaded to RAM and executed? Does this mean that
> > less mp3 caching space is available the bigger the mod gets?
>
> Correct. The flash is not updated. This leaves us less RAM for audio data
> buffering.

But, it is also quite possible that they staticly just reserve 256K for the
software and have the rest (2MB - 256K = 1792K) pretty staticly used for
audio buffering, right?

I mean, wouldn't most of us do that to avoid the complexity of using a
dynamic size depending on the current mod size?

-- 
      Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol

• Next message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• In reply to: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• Next in thread: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: maximum mod size?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]