Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: incorporate libmad in CVS?Re: incorporate libmad in CVS?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 21:34:40 +0200 (MET DST)
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Dave Chapman wrote:
> For the player/recorder differences, would it make sense to build two
> separate applications? I am assuming that we are going to end up with
> compiling multiple firmwares for the different real devices.
You're right and yes, it would probably make a lot of sense. A few object
files will be the same for both targets, but most of them will be different.
> This would need two different object directories inside the x11/win32
> directories.
Yeps.
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 21:34:40 +0200 (MET DST)
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Dave Chapman wrote:
> For the player/recorder differences, would it make sense to build two
> separate applications? I am assuming that we are going to end up with
> compiling multiple firmwares for the different real devices.
You're right and yes, it would probably make a lot of sense. A few object
files will be the same for both targets, but most of them will be different.
> This would need two different object directories inside the x11/win32
> directories.
Yeps.
-- Daniel Stenberg -- Rocking the box => http://bjorn.haxx.se/rockbox/Received on 2002-05-12
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy