|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: A cheaper remote option?Re: A cheaper remote option?
From: George Styles <george_at_ripnet.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:19:55 +0100 I bought the remote, and apart from it being shipped with flat batteries, I am very pleased with it, especially now that the new firmware for the recorder allows full browsing with it. (a 'skip to next track in a different dir. feature would be nice though). It is quite neat, and I happened to need a car adapter anyway (although why I would need another set of headphones for use in the car is a mystery to me). Its VERY difficult to make your own electronics neatly, particularly when they are very small, like a remote, also it will get a certain amount of bashing while being carried around. IMHO its worth splashing out and buying the 'proper' one. on a side note, has neone else noticed that Archos are no longer promising a separate remote for the recorder? it was 'coming soon' on their site for ages, but has now disappeared??? g ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tjerk Schuringa" <regenpak_at_yahoo.com> To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 9:01 AM Subject: Re: A cheaper remote option? > See the posts of last December. I proposed a PIC based remote and while not > finished, I used the prototype successfully since then. On a single Li cell. > IMHO it's way better than the (indeed!) overpriced and braindead solution > offered by Archos > > Tjerk > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > Received on 2002-06-09 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |