Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: noreply_at_sourceforge.net: "[ rockbox-Bugs-574060 ] No digital out on Recorder"
• Previous message: Nick Robinson: "RE: C++ in Rockbox"
• In reply to: Kjell Ericson: "RE: C++ in Rockbox"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>>>> Kjell wrote:

<off-topic>

Kjell> But the likelyhood that somebody will make terrible slow and
Kjell> large code has increased with C++.

Come on. I trust the core team to know what it is doing, that they
don't give check in access out easily and don't accept patches that
hasn't been inspected.

_AND_ I think that with C++ you can actually write better code than
with C.

On the other hand for this small and close to hardware project I agree
with Björn that C is ideal but not because we would write bad code
otherwise.

Nothing stops the interested from compiling rockbox with g++ just to
find out what the result might be in increased footprint, execution
speed etc.

</off-topic>

Yours

-- 
%% Mats

• Next message: noreply_at_sourceforge.net: "[ rockbox-Bugs-574060 ] No digital out on Recorder"
• Previous message: Nick Robinson: "RE: C++ in Rockbox"
• In reply to: Kjell Ericson: "RE: C++ in Rockbox"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]