Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Diddystar5_at_aol.com: "Re: release?"
• Previous message: Greg Haerr: "Re: Re[2]: Loadable fonts patch"
• In reply to: Greg Haerr: "Re: Re[2]: Loadable fonts patch"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Greg Haerr wrote:

> > Sounds like a good plan. The storage format would probably need to be
> > rotated though, since if I'm not mistaking your convbdf program now
> > stores the font data row by row instead of column by column that the
> > Rockbox bitmap function prefers.
>
> Is this because you have to write the bitmap display column- by-column?

Yes, the frame buffer is kept like that in memory because it is written to
the hardware that way, and then it makes sense to keep the bitmaps in that
format too.

-- 
  Daniel "Bagder" Stenberg -- http://bjorn.haxx.se/rockbox/

• Next message: Diddystar5_at_aol.com: "Re: release?"
• Previous message: Greg Haerr: "Re: Re[2]: Loadable fonts patch"
• In reply to: Greg Haerr: "Re: Re[2]: Loadable fonts patch"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]