|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re[3]: cvs: apps playlist.c,1.37,1.38Re[3]: cvs: apps playlist.c,1.37,1.38
From: Eric Linenberg <elinenbe_at_umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:16:45 -0400 I too agree. The more options the better. I don't hear anyone complaining about too many options. Many of us want to use Rockbox because it has so many options that the official firmware does not have. -eric UF> Hello Daniel, UF> Daniel Stenberg wrote on Monday, August 19, 2002, 3:43:18 PM: DS>> I fear an option-overload if we don't make some sacrifices, that's DS>> why I chose to sacrifice this. But certainly, if there's a demand DS>> for an config option, we'll have an another config option! UF> It would be nice if I could set this option, thanks. UF> I don't think that more options make the menu too complex, one can UF> arrange the menu items in logical submenus later so that the menu UF> remains usable. But limitations in RTC (size) for example could UF> generally be a problem. UF> If some day there are too many options: One could separate the options UF> that a user usually doesn't change when using RockBox and depend on UF> the users opinion and make them configurable in a Makefile before UF> compiling. The "1st file to play in shuffle mode" is one of these. So UF> the menu is not overloaded and the people (like me) that want some UF> "non-standard" behaviour can set this in a file and recompile it UF> themselves. UF> Bye, Uwe. Received on 2002-08-20 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |