Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Dave Chapman: "Re: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Previous message: Dave Chapman: "Re: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Koenig: "Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Next in thread: Paul van der Heu: "RE: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Reply: Paul van der Heu: "RE: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I seem to recall reading on this list (but can't find it
> again) that there is a bandwidth limitation in the recorder
> that means that CD quality or higher uncompressed recording
> (i.e. 44.1KHz, 16 bit, stereo = 1.35 Mbit/s) isn't
> possible, even if someone wrote the DSP code to do it.

The recording bandwidth shouldn't be a problem, it is the (serial) data link
for the playback that is the problem.

So recording would be possible, but not playback.

/Linus

• Next message: Dave Chapman: "Re: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Previous message: Dave Chapman: "Re: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Koenig: "Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Next in thread: Paul van der Heu: "RE: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Reply: Paul van der Heu: "RE: Recording Codecs: built in or custom?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]