Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Robert Hak: "Re: snow screensaver"
• Previous message: Itai: "snow screensaver"
• In reply to: Björn Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Next in thread: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Uwe Freese: "Re[3]: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed Aug 28 21:48:36 +0200 2002, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Nate Nystrom wrote:
> > Attached is a new version of the patch. I set the cap at 3% of the
> > track length.
>
> With this nice cap and automatic acceleration, why do we need *two*
> settings for it? Wasn't the whole purpose getting comfortable
> searching *without* having to fiddle with settings?
>
> --
> Björn

I think you're right that most people would rather have acceleration
than fiddle with fixed step sizes. Setting the minimum step size to
1s seems to work pretty well for me. However, if acceleration is
disabled, the behaviour is as before and having the option to change the
step size is again useful. I'm prefectly willing to remove the fixed
step size setting if that's the consensus; we can always leave it as a
compile-time option.

Nate

• Next message: Robert Hak: "Re: snow screensaver"
• Previous message: Itai: "snow screensaver"
• In reply to: Björn Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Next in thread: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Uwe Freese: "Re[3]: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]