Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: John Wood: "RE: snow screensaver"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Next in thread: Nate Nystrom: "Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Nate Nystrom: "Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Eric Linenberg: "Re[3]: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I agree. Kudos to Nate for the cool hack!

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se]On
Behalf Of Daniel Stenberg
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:24 PM
To: Rockbox
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Nate Nystrom wrote:

> I think you're right that most people would rather have acceleration than
> fiddle with fixed step sizes. Setting the minimum step size to 1s seems
to
> work pretty well for me. However, if acceleration is disabled, the
> behaviour is as before and having the option to change the step size is
> again useful. I'm prefectly willing to remove the fixed step size setting
> if that's the consensus; we can always leave it as a compile-time option.

I am for removing all (both) options for that and just have the
accelleration. Especially with that nice "max" speed hack that is a
percentage of the full song length.

Just my opinion of course.

--
Daniel "Bagder" Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/

• Next message: John Wood: "RE: snow screensaver"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Next in thread: Nate Nystrom: "Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Nate Nystrom: "Re: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Reply: Eric Linenberg: "Re[3]: [PATCH] ff/rewind acceleration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]