Rockbox mail archive
Subject: RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEPFrom: Nielsen Linus (ext) (Linus.Nielsen_at_elema.siemens.se)
Date: 2002-09-10
- Next message: Andrew Jamieson: "Re: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Maybe in reply to: Stuart Tedford: "ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Next in thread: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
I should also mention that my Recorder runs a lot longer on ATA_STANDBY than
ATA_SLEEP.
6h30 with standby, 10h30 with sleep. My current draw measurements confirm
this too.
/Linus
- Next message: Andrew Jamieson: "Re: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Maybe in reply to: Stuart Tedford: "ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Next in thread: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew