Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: jet_at_nyip.net: "RE: [PATCH] :Browser : cosmetic improvement"
• Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
• In reply to: Stuart Tedford: "ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
• Next in thread: Stuart Tedford: "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Stuart Tedford wrote:
> A while ago, I did some investigation into using poweroff for the hdd,
> rather than sleep or standby.

I've done this too. Here are my measurements:

Recorder 20 + Toshiba MK4018GAP (40 gig)

Disk Backl Mp3 mA
------------------------
idle idle idle 110 (ATA_STANDBY)
idle idle idle 70 (ATA_SLEEP)
idle idle idle 60 (ATA_POWEROFF)

Player-old + Toshiba MK6015MAP (6 gig)

Disk Backl Mp3 mA
------------------------
idle idle idle 140 (ATA_STANDBY)
idle idle idle 110 (ATA_SLEEP)

-- 
Björn

• Next message: jet_at_nyip.net: "RE: [PATCH] :Browser : cosmetic improvement"
• Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
• In reply to: Stuart Tedford: "ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
• Next in thread: Stuart Tedford: "RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]