Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Paul Suade: "Re: Rockbox for the player"
• Previous message: Vincent Kargatis: "Re: Rockbox for the player"
• Maybe in reply to: Pedro: "Rockbox for the player"
• Next in thread: Ed Wilson: "RE: Rockbox for the player"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I tend to only use one big playlist that covers all tracks on the player. So, the chances of hearing tracks again is pretty low and not really an issue.

in either case, i still think the number relative to the playlist would be more useful. In the case where you don't use the player shuffle and use your own shuffled playlist, this number would be the same anyway..

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Kargatis [mailto:lartis_at_ath.forthnet.gr]
Sent: 12 September 2002 10:34
To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
Subject: Re: Rockbox for the player

I get the impression that many people don't pre-shuffle, but instead use
shuffle mode on an ordered playlist. I'm not sure I understand the
incentive - if you ever, ever stop that shuffle, the order is gone
permanently, right? Do you just not care if you re-hear some tracks later
(in a subsequent playlist shuffle) at the expense of unheard tracks?

• Next message: Paul Suade: "Re: Rockbox for the player"
• Previous message: Vincent Kargatis: "Re: Rockbox for the player"
• Maybe in reply to: Pedro: "Rockbox for the player"
• Next in thread: Ed Wilson: "RE: Rockbox for the player"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]