Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Previous message: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• In reply to: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Next in thread: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Reply: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Reply: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

phil_at_x-phobie.de wrote:
> what is really missing are user assignable key binding schemes. But we
> need that.

No. Some people will enjoy it, but that's a far cry from "we need it".

Name one single consumer electronic device that has completely reconfigurable keys. Or just name one single mp3 software, any platform, that has fully configurable keys.

> Please don't tell me "Show me the code", because I won't do any code before
> this idea has been discussed.

Mapping keys to functions is pretty simple. Making a coherent user interface out of it is a *LOT* more complex.

Without discussing code, this issue will go nowhere. Then it's just another feature request, if somewhat more detailed. You must at least provide some idea of how you think we could implement this.

-- 
Björn

• Next message: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Previous message: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• In reply to: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Next in thread: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Reply: phil_at_x-phobie.de: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Reply: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: user editable keys binding schemes wanted"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]