Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Remote control with display
From: George Styles \(RipnetUK\) (george_at_ripnet.co.uk)
Date: 2002-10-05


I still think before we get bogged down in the detail, we need to prove that
a un-modded Archos can commnicate two way via. the headphone socket.

I also still think that connecting to a PC to get this working is the way
forward, as its a lot quicker to change software on the PC than it is to
make custom hardware to test it

just my 2c

g

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Stemmer" <Andreas.Stemmer_at_web.de>
To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: Remote control with display

> > I honestly think this way is simpler. Especially as I would
> > like to see it integrated with the WPS. If the LCD remote is
> > in, the the remote LCD WPS info is sent down the serial line.
> > If not, it is not. No extra modules (OK, maybe a new serial
> > handling module, but we need that anyway ....).
>
> I'd prefer it independent from WPS. Of course, one could design
> a special WPS for the remote and one different for the archos
> display, but I'd like to have the possibilty to let the remote
> decide, which data has to be displayed.
>
> > Now I'm not a coder, I may be wrong, but I don't see a remote
> > polled situation being any simpler
>
> Perhaps that's our problem, I'm a not a coder either ;-)
> Perhaps some rockbox guys can give a statement which solution
> is better (in terms of rockbox-realisation)
>
> > (and unless you have a 'go' button on the remote, a polled
> > situation is going to require insertion notification anyway,
> > or it will draw MUCH more power).
>
> That's true, the only difference is that in my case, only the
> remote needs to know wheter it is connected or not, the jukebox
> won't care.
>
> > Good point. Maybe have to use the Archos poll scheme ....
> > The other option would be to monitor for changes on the music
> > lines, which would indicate insertion. Maybe the lines to
> > the headphones change status on power-up? I'll check.
>
> Very good idea!
>
> > But I agree we should remain unconvinced until we can test this.
> > However, the HW should be designed to accomodate all schemes,
> > so the testing _can_ be done .... and I'm just a HW guy at heart
> > (and mind). This is why all this discussion is a good idea.
>
> My thoughts...
>
>
> Andreas Stemmer
>
>



Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa