Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: George Styles: "Re: new thread about remote control with display"
• Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: new thread about remote control with display"
• Maybe in reply to: Andreas Zwirtes: "new thread about remote control with display"
• Next in thread: Stuart Tedford: "RE: new thread about remote control with display"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> From: Andreas Stemmer
>
> Polling doesn't mean that all data has to be sent each time the remote
asks for it.
> We could of course include a "anything changed?"-command or a
> "not necessary to send data because there was no change"-answer and that's
what you proposed
> now!

OK, I can live with this version of polling - since we do need polling for
bus contention reasons. I just hate the "send me x"..."send me x"..."send
me x"..."send me x"... kind of polling.

Stu.

• Next message: George Styles: "Re: new thread about remote control with display"
• Previous message: Nielsen Linus (ext): "RE: new thread about remote control with display"
• Maybe in reply to: Andreas Zwirtes: "new thread about remote control with display"
• Next in thread: Stuart Tedford: "RE: new thread about remote control with display"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]