Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Martin Borus: "Does the hidden peak meter eat up CPU power?"
• Previous message: Henri DAVID: "RE: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• In reply to: langhaarrocker: "Re: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• Next in thread: langhaarrocker: "Re: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• Reply: langhaarrocker: "Re: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I can do that if it is really what we want. It's not very problematic.
> The biggest problem is how to explain the average user the difference
> of:
> no peak meter == save energy
> normal peak meter == waste a little energy
> precise peak meter == waste a little more energy

Well that's not that difficult to understand :) more accurate = more energy.
This just has to default to no or normal peak and maybe display a warning
when changing the setting, and document the differences on the user manual.

BoD

• Next message: Martin Borus: "Does the hidden peak meter eat up CPU power?"
• Previous message: Henri DAVID: "RE: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• In reply to: langhaarrocker: "Re: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• Next in thread: langhaarrocker: "Re: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• Reply: langhaarrocker: "Re: idea to improve the peak meter reliability"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]