Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: George Styles \(RipnetUK\): "Re: Brothers in ARMs"
• Previous message: Andreas Zwirtes: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• In reply to: Paul van der Heu: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Next in thread: Henri DAVID: "RE: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Reply: Henri DAVID: "RE: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:05:25 +0100, Paul van der Heu <pvdh_at_xs4all.nl>
wrote:

>If the peak meter interferes with the main operation of the machine
>and there is no significant reason to blame the core of the software
>the peak meter should behave better of be left out. You should not
>start hacking the (working) softwares core because an add on puts too
>much strain on it.

Principially I agree. But it is not only a peak meter problem. If you
have many lines scrolling on the wps you don't need a peak meter to
make the jukebox stutter while loading. -> It is a more basic problem.
I think we need a way to ask the loading / bitswapping engines wether
they are busy. This way we could disable performance eaters when
necessary.

• Next message: George Styles \(RipnetUK\): "Re: Brothers in ARMs"
• Previous message: Andreas Zwirtes: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• In reply to: Paul van der Heu: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Next in thread: Henri DAVID: "RE: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Reply: Henri DAVID: "RE: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]