Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: langhaarrocker: "Re: Performance problems solved"
• Previous message: Remo Hofer: "Re: NEW UI Idea for RockBox."
• In reply to: langhaarrocker: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Next in thread: BoD: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Reply: BoD: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Reply: Magnus Holmgren: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Principially I agree. But it is not only a peak meter problem. If you
> have many lines scrolling on the wps you don't need a peak meter to
> make the jukebox stutter while loading. -> It is a more basic problem.
> I think we need a way to ask the loading / bitswapping engines wether
> they are busy. This way we could disable performance eaters when
> necessary.

maybe this could be done by putting more YIELD() calls in WPS / PEAK meter
code and fewer in bitswap/ disk code ?

Am I partially right or completly wrong ?

About the scroll, do we really need a fluid scroll ? i think the previous
version of scrolling, that scrolled one char at once was fine for me

henri

• Next message: langhaarrocker: "Re: Performance problems solved"
• Previous message: Remo Hofer: "Re: NEW UI Idea for RockBox."
• In reply to: langhaarrocker: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Next in thread: BoD: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Reply: BoD: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Reply: Magnus Holmgren: "Re: How can we manage performance problems?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]