Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Stuart Tedford: "RE: Archos plans to ship Rockbox with Jukebox Studio"
• Previous message: lee donaghy: "Re: Recording"
• In reply to: Henri Tremolo: "Re: Re[2]: preamp"
• Next in thread: langhaarrocker: "Re: Re[2]: preamp"
• Reply: langhaarrocker: "Re: Re[2]: preamp"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

hi,

> I have dreamed about having a mindprint di-port:
> http://www.mindprint.com/english/indexproducts.htm
> but haven't bought it yet.

i dont own one personally, but i worked with the di-port several times in
combination with a dat recorder. it works pretty good.

> Yes, i agree, it's big and costs nearly 400eur, but
> on the other hand, I have already rack full of expensive
> devices and my fiancee doesn't even blame me
> about it...

the di-port costs in germany about 250 euro.

> But.. one thing: Why expect more than CD-quality,
> when it will be packed to mp3? Analog input will be
> all right for mobile recordings with microphones,
> imho.

i did recordings with the archos, using the analog or the digital input.
both times it was connected to the 2track-output of a stage mixer, wich
provides a second master signal outlet without PA-eq and -dynamicpocessing.
the recording with my dat-recorder acting as a-d was noticable better. ( i
recorded in 48khz, with the highest mp3 quality).

/julius.

• Next message: Stuart Tedford: "RE: Archos plans to ship Rockbox with Jukebox Studio"
• Previous message: lee donaghy: "Re: Recording"
• In reply to: Henri Tremolo: "Re: Re[2]: preamp"
• Next in thread: langhaarrocker: "Re: Re[2]: preamp"
• Reply: langhaarrocker: "Re: Re[2]: preamp"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]