Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: gerald_clark_at_mindspring.com: "Re: Re[2]: cvs: apps settings.c,1.99,1.100 settings.h,1.64,1.65 settings_menu.c,1.89,1.90"
• Previous message: Uwe Freese: "recording frequencies order"
• Maybe in reply to: Uwe Freese: "Re[2]: cvs: apps settings.c,1.99,1.100 settings.h,1.64,1.65 settings_menu.c,1.89,1.90"
• Next in thread: zOOm: "char problem"
• Reply: zOOm: "char problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well my cells are rated at 1850 mah, so I vote for 50.

On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:08:01 +0100 Uwe Freese <mail_at_uwe-freese.de> wrote:

> Hello Björn,
>
> Björn Stenberg wrote on Monday, December 16,
> 2002, 2:36:20 PM:
>
> >> >Any particular reason you chose to use a
> list of fixed values
> >> >instead of something like (1500 + x*50) ?
>
> BS> We still have 138 unused bytes in the
> settings sector. I say we
> BS> waste one of them on battery capacity and
> avoid a predefined list.
>
> OK, change it if you like. At least, it would
> be nice if you (or Linus)
> add the code for saving/reading to the sector
> on disk.
> Anyway, I think values from 1500 to 2200 are
> ok, should it be 50 or 100
> mAh intervals?
>
> Bye, Uwe.
>
>

• Next message: gerald_clark_at_mindspring.com: "Re: Re[2]: cvs: apps settings.c,1.99,1.100 settings.h,1.64,1.65 settings_menu.c,1.89,1.90"
• Previous message: Uwe Freese: "recording frequencies order"
• Maybe in reply to: Uwe Freese: "Re[2]: cvs: apps settings.c,1.99,1.100 settings.h,1.64,1.65 settings_menu.c,1.89,1.90"
• Next in thread: zOOm: "char problem"
• Reply: zOOm: "char problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]