Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Uwe Freese: "need RTC help!"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• Next in thread: for_spam_at_gmx.de: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• Reply: for_spam_at_gmx.de: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:32:31 +0100 (MET), Daniel Stenberg
<daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:

>On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, langhaarrocker wrote:
>
>> Maybe it would be easier to adopt the build process so that the bitmap that
>> is to be compiled in can be specified.
>
>That would be very easy, since "bmp2rb" already exists to convert a given BMP
>file into a C source array suitable for Rockbox...

drawback: only a limited bunch of users will be able to go this path
since it has proven that it isn't simple to setup and manage the
development environment.
But as someone stated before: I don't bother about the logo.

Phil

• Next message: Uwe Freese: "need RTC help!"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• Next in thread: for_spam_at_gmx.de: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• Reply: for_spam_at_gmx.de: "Re: individual Logo (was:) Logo Bitmap Size"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]