|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: batteriesRE: batteries
From: James Ockwell <James_at_justrams.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:18:56 +0000 ********************************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify mail_at_justrams.co.uk - Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do not necessarily coincide with those of Just Rams Plc. Computer viruses can be transmitted with e-mails. The recipient must virus-check this email and any attachments. E-mails may be monitored and stored. *********************************************************************************** Dear Ewe, How does bitrate affect the calculations ? I ask as most of my recordings are done at 192Kb or higher, which must access the disc more often ? Thanks, James ===== Original Message from rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se at 09/01/03 12:26 Hello Ed, Ed Wilson wrote on Thursday, January 9, 2003, 12:55:22 PM: EW> b) whats the best way to use this setting.. should it match the EW> battery precisely or should you set it a little higher/lower You should set the correct value there. If your batteries are old and you think they have lost capacity, you can set the value lower. The calculated running time is calculated out of the value, for the charging, it only has less importance. EW> c) how much benefit would I get from getting some better batteries EW> (2400 seems to be the maximum setting although I think I've only EW> ever seen people mention 2000mAh on this list) That's linear. Using 2000 mAh batteries instead of 1500 mAh add 33% running time. Please read also docs/CHARGING_ALGORITHM, if you are generally interested in more details. Bye, Uwe. Received on 2003-01-09 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |