Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: anti-skip buffer question
From: Bryce Benton (me_at_brycebenton.com)
Date: 2003-01-13


can you (or someone) be more specific?

do i understand correctly: longer buffer time means less battery
consumption because the disk doesn't have to spin up as often?

if that's true, my question remains... in what cases would someone want
less than the maximum buffer time?

thanks,
bryce

> > how does the anti-skip buffer affect performance?
> >
> > or... is there any reason to select less than the longest time for
>this
> > setting?
>
>Eats more battery, since it reduces the time between disk reads by the
>buffer amount.
>
>v



Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa