Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Stuart Tedford: "RE: anti-skip buffer question"
• Previous message: Bryce Benton: "boot up with usb --> archos firmware"
• In reply to: Vincent Kargatis: "Re: anti-skip buffer question"
• Next in thread: Stuart Tedford: "RE: anti-skip buffer question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

can you (or someone) be more specific?

do i understand correctly: longer buffer time means less battery
consumption because the disk doesn't have to spin up as often?

if that's true, my question remains... in what cases would someone want
less than the maximum buffer time?

thanks,
bryce

> > how does the anti-skip buffer affect performance?
> >
> > or... is there any reason to select less than the longest time for
>this
> > setting?
>
>Eats more battery, since it reduces the time between disk reads by the
>buffer amount.
>
>v

• Next message: Stuart Tedford: "RE: anti-skip buffer question"
• Previous message: Bryce Benton: "boot up with usb --> archos firmware"
• In reply to: Vincent Kargatis: "Re: anti-skip buffer question"
• Next in thread: Stuart Tedford: "RE: anti-skip buffer question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]