Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Uwe Freese: "my opinion on Config menu cancel"
• Previous message: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• In reply to: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Matthew P. OReilly wrote:

> So does that make it easier or harder to do a post-write check
> (user-initiated) on the file to see if the headers are in fact correct?

Ok, I'm now trespassing in an area where Linus is the expert and I am but a
novice.

Verifying that the Xing header data of a particular is in fact correct would
need the entire file scanned.

If I'm not mistaking, the Xing basicly offers 100 indexes into the file, to
allow quick-jumping to various positions in the file.

I'm not sure how we are (or rather Linus is) going to make the header.

-- 
 Daniel Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/

• Next message: Uwe Freese: "my opinion on Config menu cancel"
• Previous message: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• In reply to: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]