Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?From: langhaarrocker (phil_at_x-phobie.de)
Date: 2003-01-16
- Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Preliminary support for Recorder FM - volunteers needed to test."
- In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:59:09 +0100, Linus Nielsen Feltzing
<linus_at_haxx.se> wrote:
>Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>The recording function will
>allocate free space in the beginning of the file for this, as well as
>space for ID3V2 tags.
(snip)
>This function will also be available to run on any VBR file without a
>header.
Does that mean that you can _insert_ space at the beginning of a file
that already exists? Or does that mean that the file has to be copied?
Phil
- Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Preliminary support for Recorder FM - volunteers needed to test."
- In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew