Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: RAM size: 8MB (who uses less than that?)
From: Matthias Wächter (matthias_at_waechter.wiz.at)
Hi guys, I'm sorry that was in German.
Let me translate.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Uwe Freese wrote:
> I already though we wouldn't get your docs these days ;)
It's just time. I have a lot to do since my first child is born in April,
especially in my flat, at work designing a network IC and with my diploma
> I already ordered "Micron 50ns EDO" for 5 EUR + tax + p&p, and at
> another store Hynix 60ns EDO for 9 EUR + tax + p&p. The Micron ones are
> expected to be delivered by tomorrow or the day after, with a little
> luck I can do the mod at the weekend.
Cool! I'm expecting your experiences (with your recorder)!
> On my search for the memories I saw the refresh value in some data
> sheets and that's the only point I don't get. There are 4k and 8k
> refresh types of 8MByte (4Mx16) RAMs and the built-in 2MByte (1Mx16)
> has 1k refresh.
That's simple. Assume you have 'n' address lines on the RAM which are not
enough to address the total 'm' address lines for 4M or 1M (x16). For
4Mx16 m=22, for 1Mx16 m=20. These 'm' address lines are multiplexed on the
'n' address lines of the DRAM, and for the muxing RAS and CAS are used.
The main question is: How is the splitting between RAS and CAS access
done? At the current 1Mx16 with m=20 and n=10 it's simple: The first 10
address lines (higher) are transferred with the RAS cycle, the second part
(lower) address lines are transferred with the CAS cycle. With the 4M x 16
there are different possibilities. In theory for m=22 a value of 11 for n
would have been enough, and that was what I expected to get. But I saw
very soon that neither these chips exist nor the SH-1 would support them:
The SH-1 can only shift between RAS and CAS access by 8, 9, or 10 address
lines, so it would be fatal to use such a RAM with the DRAM controller of
the SH-1 (and IMO they don't exist either). Instead we have to search for
RAMs taking the most significant 12 addresses at RAS cycle time, so for
the CAS cycle only the least significant 10 addresses are transferred. The
SH-1 is already set up for 10 bit shift (see above) for address lines. The
RAMs will have 12 address pins which is of course the higher value of the
> Somehow this means, x thousand times per y milliseconds there has to be
> a refresh. With larger memories the value x is always higher. Both
> memory types ordered by me are 4k refresh cycle types what would be OK
> according to your docs. What would happen if the DRAM would have 8k
> refresh cycles? Would the CPU then support this DRAM?
From the RAS/CAS splitting also the number of refresh cycles can be
directly calculated: Usually the DRAMs support RAS-only refresh, this
means roughly that for a refresh cycle a normal access cycle is started
but only the RAS part is finished. So the memory area is read and
refreshed but not output to the data pins because there was no CAS cycle.
If the DRAM uses 12 address pins for RAS access you get a total of 4k
refresh cycles for the whole memory, and the data sheet also reflects the
maximum time for a complete refresh to not lose data. The original RAM
soldered in the AJB has a RAS=10 bit so we have a total of 1k refresh
cycles. If you have a 4Mx16 DRAM with 8k refresh this means that the RAM
uses 13 address pins for RAS and only 9 address pins for CAS. Don't ask me
whether this will work in a AJB (of course the pinning will be different
then as well, anyway Rockbox would have to change the DRAM controller
configuration then to get support for the complete DRAM without memory
area aliasing by only shifting 9 address pins at CAS cycles.
That's the short version. :-)
> You write "The address shift for CAS access must be 10 bit.". Hmm? ;-)
I hope you get the point if you read the above paragraphs. I will look to
update the docs.
> Are the values given for the Micron (see attached data sheet)?
Great data sheet compared to my Hynix one! The data sheet precisely
reflects the number of address pins used for RAS and CAS and how it
relates to the refresh cycles.
BTW: If you have less refresh cycles: You have less performance loss of
the DRAM controller (for constant total refresh time) which is an
advantage, the disadvantage is that the chip refreshes large memory areas
at the same time so the refresh current consumption is larger than with
more refresh cycles for smaller memory areas.
> If everything goes well I will finally take some pictures of the
> recorder mods and give appropriate additional description for it.
Great. I will link to your page then.
> P.S: Have you seen my Alarm-Mod yet? :-)
Yes, I got in on the ML. My player doesn't have an RTC, in general I think
about going for a newer model. Do you know: Does the FM recorder have an
In general I'd like to enhance HW mods. Small patches for making the OFF
key lockable. In addition I'd like to patch the Flash to get completely
rid of the Jukebox firmware :-)
"To get control over people, make them trust you.
To make people trust you
don't try to tell them the truth about history
but make happen what you told them about the future."
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew