|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?Re: Xing headers optional? Re: Record bug?
From: gerald clark <gerald_clark_at_mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:16:11 -0600 How big is the header? Seems a shame to waste a whole allocation block. Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote: > langhaarrocker wrote: > >> What about some really evil file operation that: >> 1) allocates a new cluster on the hd >> 2) fills the cluster with a header and dummy filler data >> 3) relink this cluster in the FAT with the mp3 file > > > Sure, that's perfectly possible. > >> That's a job I wouldn't like to do. Too much hardcore file system >> programming which I have no clue of. > > > Nah, it isn't hard at all. > > But let Zagor do it, then we can blame him when we trash our files. :-) > > /Linus > > -- Gerald L. Clark Aero TerraTrike #1 http://www.wizwheelz.com/images/clarkaerotrike1.jpg Member: Sky Soaring Illinois, U.S.A. Archos Recorder JBR20101 1.28 0x302 positive 0x200 positive 11.0592Received on 2003-01-18 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |