Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• In reply to: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Next in thread: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Reply: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

grrrr... Ill defend Bjorn (sorry.. no umluat on this keyboard) about this.

We get complaints/comments about 'why don't you have X?' or 'Where is
feature Y! I want Y!'

_every_ project hits the same problem.

_every_ project needs to draw the line somewhere.

I stand with Bjorn on his. It's not attitude, it's silencing those that
just want to bitch.

my 2 bits.

/Adi

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Holger Lembke wrote:

> And why don't I see the patch tracker being
> filled with your patches to implement all these things?

I love that attitude.

-- 
Holger Lembke
+-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --+
|  Robert E. Hak  < http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~rhak >  |
"I've learned that if someone says something unkind of me, I must live so that
 no one will believe it."

• Next message: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• In reply to: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Next in thread: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Reply: Holger Lembke: "RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]