|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: [off-topic] flamingRE: [off-topic] flaming
From: Sundar, Shekhar (MSTG-NY) <"Sundar,>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:41:47 -0500 ...to add to my 2cents to this non-productive thread: you are assuming equal weight for all the features. I would weigh some feature (like fast playlist reading and rolo among many) 10000 times over some things that the firmware has and rockbox doesn't (not many at this point).. so depending on the weight of the features, I think that even 648466^51658 is very probable estimation. -SS -----Original Message----- From: Vladimir Pantelic [mailto:pan_at_nt.tu-darmstadt.de] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:14 PM To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se Subject: Re: [off-topic] flaming BoD wrote: > > How did you make this estimation? I think a good estimation would be based > on the difference of features between the two firmwares. According to > http://rockbox.haxx.se/docs/features.html, there is 36 "good" features on > rockbox and 14 on archos. So I think we can say rockbox is only about 2.57 > times better than the original one. This list lacks one item: Maximum number of files/dirs in one directory: 200(Rockbox) vs 999(Archos) so the score is 36/15 :-) Regards, Vladimir Received on 2003-01-29 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |