|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: [off-topic] flamingRe: [off-topic] flaming
From: BoD <BoD_at_JRAF.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:40:23 +0100 Imho, 648466^51658 is more that the number of particles in the universe. But I do agree that my first estimation was not reflecting the coolness of being able to compile it yourself, and the "weight" of the features. Not mentionning the cool logo ;) By the way, I'll try to extend the feature comparison chart with data from the iPod! I think this can be interesting even if it's not really related to rockbox at all... BoD Sundar, Shekhar (MSTG-NY) wrote: > ...to add to my 2cents to this non-productive thread: > > you are assuming equal weight for all the features. I would weigh > some feature (like fast playlist reading and rolo among many) 10000 > times over some things that the firmware has and rockbox doesn't (not > many at this point).. so depending on the weight of the features, I > think that even 648466^51658 is very probable estimation. > > -SS > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Pantelic [mailto:pan_at_nt.tu-darmstadt.de] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:14 PM > To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se > Subject: Re: [off-topic] flaming > > > BoD wrote: > > > > How did you make this estimation? I think a good estimation would > > be based on the difference of features between the two firmwares. > > According to http://rockbox.haxx.se/docs/features.html, there is 36 > > "good" features on rockbox and 14 on archos. So I think we can say > > rockbox is only about 2.57 times better than the original one. > > This list lacks one item: > > Maximum number of files/dirs in one directory: 200(Rockbox) vs > 999(Archos) so the score is 36/15 :-) > > Regards, > > Vladimir Received on 2003-01-30 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |