|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: another 8MB upgrade success storyRE: another 8MB upgrade success story
From: Justin Heiner <jheiner_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:22:35 -0700 Same reason that we merged the player-old and player-new firmware together. Less confusing for people, easier to switch back and forth, less builds, etc. -Justin ---------- Original Message ---------- To: (rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se) From: TP Diffenbach (rockbox_at_diffenbach.org) Subject: RE: another 8MB upgrade success story Date: 3/19/2003 3:16:28p > Why do you prefer to have rockbox dynamically recognize your memory size, > rather than build for a particular size? > > Quoting Leif Sawyer <lsawyer_at_gci.com>: > > > > I could really use that 8M upgrade, and knowing that the code > > "just knew" how to deal with that would make my life simpler. > > (Of course, i still have to get the upgrade.. :-( ) > > > > > > It sounds like the first thing is just to outline exactly what > > buffer changes need to take place, reserve a few bytes in memory > > for 'hardcoding' these values, then adjusting them if we find > > more than 2M. ( X << 4 , or whatever the local equivalent is to > > quickly multiply by 4, as that's the difference..) > > > > Would that be a reasonable approach? > > > > > > > > > -- > Archos FM needs a Rockbox! Received on 2003-03-19 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |