From: Robert Hak <rhak_at_ramapo.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:32:22 -0400 (EDT)

I don't remember off hand where the source was, or where in the
mailinglist the conersation was, but if you would like I can dig that up
for you.

actually, I'll dig it up tonight anyways :) Someone is bound to want to
see it :)

Fair warning though. Part of the problem faced was the developer worked
off the 1.4 release and refused to update to the current cvs version. So
something might be well out of sorts.

/Adi

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Blue Chip wrote:

Yes, that makes sense of his suggestion - yes, a misunderstanding it would
seem.
Sounds far more interesting when put like that.
Is the last (rejected) solution available to look at?

+-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --+
| Robert E. Hak < http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~rhak > |

"We live together, we act on and react to, one another; but always and in all
 circumstances we are by ourselves."
        - Aldous Huxley
Received on 2003-04-09