|
|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: What function loads a .lang file?From: TP Diffenbach (rockbox_at_diffenbach.org) Date: 2003-04-30
Quoting Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>:
> TP Diffenbach wrote:
> Not very user friendly, is it? With this argument, you will never
How often will a user remove a .lang file he has been using enough to have saved configs in? "I hereby renounce my native country and its despicable langauge! Hever able shall I speak my mother tongue!"
Consensus, Linus, usually means more than one voice. :-) As much as you've contributed to Rockbox, and even as much as those contibutions rightly give you large voice, I'm still not sure you constitute a consensus. But I'll shelve the idea of translating configs for now.
> > But I really think the "average user" benefits from configs
> Writing cfg files by hand is probably beyond the average user
I wasn't thinking of the /writing/ of the configs. I was thinking of the user /reading/ the config. It's the one place where Joe User can see all of his settings. In fact, I'd also like to see all possible options /listed/, or given as a range, in a #remarked line ahead of each setting, e.g.:
#Repeat mode options: one of "off", "all", "one"
> I agree. We need to clean up the settings code.
So you don't mind I I contibnue on that? :-)
-- Archos FM needs a Rockbox!
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew |