Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Johan Vromans: "Cables"
• Previous message: lee donaghy: "Re: Cables"
• In reply to: laurent: "Re: bmp.c -> why a bmp file reader?"
• Next in thread: laurent: "Re: bmp.c -> why a bmp file reader?"
• Reply: laurent: "Re: bmp.c -> why a bmp file reader?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 6 May 2003, laurent wrote:

> > Eh, why? Would it really be *that* fun to replace single icons etc?
>
> I was just thinking my jukebox is becoming more than just a mp3
> player/recorder with games, file borwsing, searching.... It will apparently
> sonn have calender, cantact, text editor. It'll be a kind of a little PDA,
> and managing all that feature with text menu is a little annoying....

I don't understand exactly where you're heading with this, but yes, future
applications might indeed need or want a BMP loader/display function and
sure, then we'll add it (we had one included once).

But at this point I can't see the need for it. Can you?

-- 
 Daniel Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/

• Next message: Johan Vromans: "Cables"
• Previous message: lee donaghy: "Re: Cables"
• In reply to: laurent: "Re: bmp.c -> why a bmp file reader?"
• Next in thread: laurent: "Re: bmp.c -> why a bmp file reader?"
• Reply: laurent: "Re: bmp.c -> why a bmp file reader?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]