Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Jean Boullier: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Next in thread: Jean Boullier: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Reply: Jean Boullier: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 20 May 2003, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

> But, it would all of a sudden introduce model-dependent language files, a
> thing that we haven't today.

True.
But we should also get shorter language files (some few bytes).

> and then refuse to load the "wrong" kind in the software.

That could be nice. But the language files are downloadable with the
executable file, so unless you really take the wrong version you won't get
any problem.

Is anyone downloading the language files separatly from the webpage without
the code?

> All this taken into account, I'm not sure if I agree or disagree! ;-)

At least you don't totally reject it :-)

  // Kjell

• Next message: Jean Boullier: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Next in thread: Jean Boullier: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Reply: Jean Boullier: "Re: Length of Players' strings in language files"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]