Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Boris Maras: "Re: minimalistic win32 rockbox sdk update"
• Previous message: Frank Incensed: "Re: Removing drivers"
• In reply to: Andreas Stemmer: "RE: Flash ROM survey wrapup, boot ROM research"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I really appreciate your effort to get rockbox into rom, but how much
> time do you expect to save this way? I did a quick test: it takes about
> 15s to boot rockbox and about 12s to boot directly from rom without any
> ajbrec.ajz.

I consider these 12s a fault of the original firmware, that's what's to be
replaced. By now we have no clue what the firmware is doing within that time,
I think Rockbox could do better.

> There's not a big difference because you have to spin up the
> harddisk anyway to look for an alternative ajbrec.ajz. When the disk is
> running, loading it into ram is done quickly.

Spinning up the disk takes no more than 3 seconds. If this will be the very
first thing which "ROMBox" will do, all other inits while that's is in
progress, we can cut the corners pretty good...

> Just my thoughts...

Thanks for worrying ;-)
I prefer to find out first.

Greetings,
Jörg

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

• Next message: Boris Maras: "Re: minimalistic win32 rockbox sdk update"
• Previous message: Frank Incensed: "Re: Removing drivers"
• In reply to: Andreas Stemmer: "RE: Flash ROM survey wrapup, boot ROM research"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]