Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Johan Vromans: "Impressive plugins"
• Previous message: Tom Sustins: "Plugins, News and the Website"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Next in thread: Mark Bright: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Reply: Mark Bright: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Linus Nielsen Feltzing said:
> BlueChip wrote:
>> PLEASE can we stick with THREE character extensions for our filenames?
>
> I agree. Three character extensions are almost a de facto standard.

Only for people using a flawed O/S ;-)

What about .html/.htm? .html is more a standard than .htm. With a modern
O/S that handles long filenames properly, it really shouldn't make any
difference whatsoever.

-- 
Mike Holden
Rockbox page: http://www.mikeholden.org/~rockbox

• Next message: Johan Vromans: "Impressive plugins"
• Previous message: Tom Sustins: "Plugins, News and the Website"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Next in thread: Mark Bright: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Reply: Mark Bright: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]