Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Martin Borus: "Comment on mono recording bugfix"
• Previous message: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• In reply to: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Next in thread: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Reply: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Reply: for_spam_at_gmx.de: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, BlueChip wrote:

> I also gave some reasoning in my original post, but it has been <snip>ped!?

You named a few examples of other three-letter extensions, no real reasons.

> Finally, it's nice to be able to type "dir" and not get a bunch of gargabe
> filenames - such is what us M$ users have to suffer when the file extension
> goes over 3 characters :(

? Surely it supports long file names too?

I'm FOR long extensions. I hate to cripple things in Rockbox due to inferior
operating systems.

-- 
 Daniel Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/

• Next message: Martin Borus: "Comment on mono recording bugfix"
• Previous message: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• In reply to: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Next in thread: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Reply: BlueChip: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Reply: for_spam_at_gmx.de: "Re: question about plugins .rock"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]