|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: SH-1 scratchpadRE: SH-1 scratchpad
From: Adam Billyard <Ads_at_CSL.COM>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:36:43 +0100 Sure but isn't there >2K sitting there doing nothing (0x0f000e50=_iramend). I'd certainly put the stacks of time-critical threads in there. -----Original Message----- From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing [mailto:linus_at_haxx.se] Sent: 11 July 2003 11:25 To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se Subject: Re: SH-1 scratchpad Adam Billyard wrote: > Any reason you don't use SH-1 scratchpad for the stack storage? It should > improve performance and it doesn't look like its being used by anything > else. If you mean the internal 4Kbyte RAM, we use it for time-critical code, like the scheduler, bit swapping, ATA driver etc. Linus Received on 2003-07-11 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |