Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Jerry Van Baren: "Re: offending language? me!"
• Previous message: mourad jaber: "Charging pb after deep discharge"
• Next in thread: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "Re: I dont think the flashing tool should be a plugin.."
• Reply: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "Re: I dont think the flashing tool should be a plugin.."
• Reply: Jean Boullier: "Re: I dont think the flashing tool should be a plugin.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

    .. i think it should be built into the main firmware. The reason being
that its a PITA when you get incompatable version error.

When I re-build the daily release, I like to put the .ucl find on the JB and
update all the .rocks.

At the moment, I need to keep the old rockboxflash.rock somewhere else, for
the job of flashing.

It would be much nicer if I could just flash from the firmware, with having
to worry about the version of the flasher I have

This would reduce the 'upgrade procedure' from about 4 steps to 2 or so

what do people think? i love the plugin system, but I think this should be a
built-in

george

• Next message: Jerry Van Baren: "Re: offending language? me!"
• Previous message: mourad jaber: "Charging pb after deep discharge"
• Next in thread: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "Re: I dont think the flashing tool should be a plugin.."
• Reply: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "Re: I dont think the flashing tool should be a plugin.."
• Reply: Jean Boullier: "Re: I dont think the flashing tool should be a plugin.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]