Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Diddystar5_at_aol.com: "Re: .rockbox/fonts and .rockbox/languages"
• Previous message: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Documentation"
• In reply to: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Documentation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Matthew P. OReilly wrote:
> "They were thought to be irr-elephant."
>
> You're right - the whole trunk of this thread has become so. That was a
> pretty quick pun... have you been saving that, or are you just shooting
> from the hippo?

I was just lion in wait for an oppor-tuna-ty. But then ewe probably gnu
that.

> But enough about pachyderms. I say enough with this bull - we should
> get back to the tusk at hand and let this thread tapir off.
>
> <smirk>
> Matt

I see that you suffer from the same congenital defect that plagues me. You
have my sympathies. Perhaps we should start a support group? Or would that
lead to grizzly consequences, about which we cannot bear to think?

• Next message: Diddystar5_at_aol.com: "Re: .rockbox/fonts and .rockbox/languages"
• Previous message: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Documentation"
• In reply to: Matthew P. OReilly: "RE: Documentation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]