Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Tim Elliott: "software "off" button?"
• Previous message: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "Re: no more startup-rolo of ajbrec.ajz why?"
• In reply to: Rob: "voice recording..."
• Next in thread: Rob: "Re: voice recording..."
• Reply: Rob: "Re: voice recording..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Both are VBR and should have "similar" sizes, except if one speaker
shouts and the other wispers, maybe. 8-)

You might look at each file with a PC player like Winamp (for example)
to compare technical characteristics of each file ("File Info Box" for
Winamp). If there are differences between Archos and Rockbox recording
modes they should be visible. What I have in mind is that Archos might
force the mono mode for the low quality settings while in Rockbox you
have to set mono or stereo yourself.

Cheers. Jean.

Rob wrote:

> Hi. I am curious about voice recording of Rockbox versus Archos code.
>
> It seems that using absolute worst recording settings (ideal for
> recording university lectures), Rockbox takes 10MB to record a 50
> minute lecture. However the Archos code only takes about 7.5MB at it's
> absolute worst settings.
>
> Does Archos use VBR and Rockbox NOT use VBR?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rob
>
>

-- 
Jean Boullier - Rouen - Normandie - France

• Next message: Tim Elliott: "software "off" button?"
• Previous message: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "Re: no more startup-rolo of ajbrec.ajz why?"
• In reply to: Rob: "voice recording..."
• Next in thread: Rob: "Re: voice recording..."
• Reply: Rob: "Re: voice recording..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]