Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: scott: "Re: FMR (flashed version) charging"
• Previous message: mrlipring: "Re: usb2 on the archos"
• In reply to: David McIntyre: "Re: usb2 on the archos"
• Next in thread: Kevin R. Jones: "RE: usb2 on the archos"
• Reply: Kevin R. Jones: "RE: usb2 on the archos"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The table is alright - good that everything's in MB (MegaBytes)

In MegaBits:
400 Mb/sec FireWire
480 Mb/sec USB 2.0

Clear as sausage-water,
/JG

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 at 11:04, David McIntyre wrote:

> The specs would show that USB 2 is faster than Firewire. The actual benchmarks
> show that Firewire is faster by a pretty broad margin. As far as hard drive
> access goes, drive transfer rates are measured in megabytes/sec, as the
> communication to the drive runs in parallel. Serial data communication, like
> Firewire, USB, and Ethernet, measure speeds in megabits/sec.

> > USB 1.1 1.5
> > USB 2.0 60
> > FireWire (IEEE 1394) 50
> > FireWire (IEEE 1394b) 100

• Next message: scott: "Re: FMR (flashed version) charging"
• Previous message: mrlipring: "Re: usb2 on the archos"
• In reply to: David McIntyre: "Re: usb2 on the archos"
• Next in thread: Kevin R. Jones: "RE: usb2 on the archos"
• Reply: Kevin R. Jones: "RE: usb2 on the archos"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]