Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Neon John: "Re: High tech shock absorber dreams"
• Previous message: LoveLearn: "High tech shock absorber dreams"
• In reply to: LoveLearn: "High tech shock absorber dreams"
• Next in thread: LoveLearn: "Better Baby Bumpers"
• Reply: LoveLearn: "Better Baby Bumpers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In the spirit of DIY, I applaud your suggestion and respond with, "Give it a
shot and report back with the results!".

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:49:49PM -0500, LoveLearn wrote:
> Current competing product makers just ignore Archos bumpers. But if they
> had my bumper design, I think comparative drop tests showing I-Pods et.
> al breaking in their own equivelant ways to those eggs in the TV demo,
> while a high tech bumper protected product survived over and over from
> the same drop, bumpers could no longer be ignored as a competitive
> feature. Thoughts?
> John LoveLearn

-- 
David McIntyre         plugh_at_mudbarn.com        http://www.mudbarn.com
PGP Key fingerprint = CAB5 A73A 43FA 19E3 449D  20B8 25D7 FA84 8847 D6A7
http://www.mudbarn.com/~plugh/plughinfo.txt for geek code, pgp key, etc. 

• Next message: Neon John: "Re: High tech shock absorber dreams"
• Previous message: LoveLearn: "High tech shock absorber dreams"
• In reply to: LoveLearn: "High tech shock absorber dreams"
• Next in thread: LoveLearn: "Better Baby Bumpers"
• Reply: LoveLearn: "Better Baby Bumpers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]