Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: David McIntyre: "Re: Resume on a per-directory basis."
• Previous message: Paul: "Re: Resume on a per-directory basis."
• In reply to: Martin Borus: "Re: Long term recording tests..."
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Long term recording tests..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I would vote for an optional or no VBR header, especially if it reduces the
gap in time split recordings.

Martin Borus writes:

> Am 14 Oct 2003 um 10:38 hat Dave Jones geschrieben:
>
>> I could also submit a patch that would
>> turn off the VBR header writing code if the record split feature is
>> enabled. That would be the easiest short-term work-around. Any comments?
>
> I would like that. For my long time recordings the VBR header
> normally doesn't make any sense anyways:
> I always cut them up later using mp3directcut to get the bits of the
> recording I want. Also, this might reduce the gap in the recording.
>
> What do the "other long time recorders" think?
 

• Next message: David McIntyre: "Re: Resume on a per-directory basis."
• Previous message: Paul: "Re: Resume on a per-directory basis."
• In reply to: Martin Borus: "Re: Long term recording tests..."
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Long term recording tests..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]