Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: John Covici: "Re: working on a feature (maybe)?"
• Previous message: John covici: "RE: working on a feature (maybe)?"
• Maybe in reply to: Fred Maxwell: "HTML - was RE: Flashed RB still having charging issues.."
• Next in thread: David McIntyre: "Re: HTML - was RE: Flashed RB still having charging issues.."
• Reply: David McIntyre: "Re: HTML - was RE: Flashed RB still having charging issues.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> > Frankly, HTML has a lot of advantages, such as the ones mentioned
> > above.
>
> Hehe, personally, I regard those as being one of the many
> disadvantages...

How is it a "disadvantage" to be able to say "see my changes in red below"
or "as per the boldfaced sentence above"? I can't understand how you could
view the ability to format text as a disadvantage.

> Also, automatic handling of messaged, like spam filtering, is more
> difficult when the messages are in HTML format.

I own and run the domain anti-spam.org. I would be happy to assist you with
spam filtering if it's causing you difficulties.

Regards,
  Fred Maxwell

• Next message: John Covici: "Re: working on a feature (maybe)?"
• Previous message: John covici: "RE: working on a feature (maybe)?"
• Maybe in reply to: Fred Maxwell: "HTML - was RE: Flashed RB still having charging issues.."
• Next in thread: David McIntyre: "Re: HTML - was RE: Flashed RB still having charging issues.."
• Reply: David McIntyre: "Re: HTML - was RE: Flashed RB still having charging issues.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]