Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Henri: "RE: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Previous message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Resume on STOP behaviour"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Next in thread: Henri: "RE: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Reply: Henri: "RE: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Reply: Neon John: "Re: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:

> I have a weak memory, so I would like to take this up for discussion again.
> Why did we change this? I think the previous behaviour made the most sense.

I'm definitely FOR agressive resuming. I don't see how this harms anyone (you
can always say no when you have set to ASK), and it does save my ass many
times when I hit stop and not shutoff properly.

I'm not exactly sure what happens otherwise when I have the charger connected
and I press stop. When I later disconnect the charger and shutoff, I want it
to resume from where I pressed stop previously (hours ago).

Any particular reasons you believe this is bad?

-- 
 Daniel Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/

• Next message: Henri: "RE: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Previous message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Resume on STOP behaviour"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Next in thread: Henri: "RE: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Reply: Henri: "RE: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Reply: Neon John: "Re: Resume on STOP behaviour"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]