Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Suggestion on a 2.1 release
From: Chris Hoekstra (chris_hoekstra_at_hotmail.com)
Second the motion.
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>I suggest that we package and release EXACTLY what we have now in CVS, without
>waiting for _any_ additional patches. (With the exception of bug fixes.)
>I fully agree that several of the patches in the patch tracker are way cool
>and should go in soon, but let's do them after the 2.1 release. Heck, if we
>just get all the nice patches in, we could release a 2.2 immediately and that
>wouldn't have to wait another eon.
>If someone steps forward very soon and volounteers to do the editing, I
>suggest that we give a little extra time for the documentation to get updated.
>This approach is suggested to achieve a 2.1 release very soon with what we
>have already. Adding lots of new patches would require an additional
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew