Rockbox mail archive
Subject: RE: Suggestion on a 2.1 release
From: Fred Maxwell (rockbox_at_anti-spam.org)
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> I suggest that we package and release EXACTLY what we have
> now in CVS, without waiting for _any_ additional patches.
> (With the exception of bug fixes.)
I agree. To expand further, though, I believe that there has to be a
feature freeze, documentation update, beta release, short testing period to
assure no serious bugs, followed by a 2.1 release. I'm not talking about
weeks of testing, just enough to turn up any serious problems.
> I fully agree that several of the patches in the patch tracker
> are way cool and should go in soon, but let's do them after
> the 2.1 release. Heck, if we just get all the nice patches in,
> we could release a 2.2 immediately and that wouldn't have to
> wait another eon.
The other advantage to not including all of the nifty patches in the next
release is that it lessens the work necessary for the documentation/manual.
Powerful features often require lengthy documentation and the changes
between 2.0 and what's currently in the daily builds is already very
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew