|
|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re[2]: Suggestion on a 2.1 releaseFrom: Mat Holton (mathew.holton_at_surface-inspection.com) Date: 2003-11-24
Yeah, I think it would be a really good idea to be able to customize
Is anyone working on this? or is it worth me starting to hack away?
-----Original Message-----From: George Styles <george_at_ripnet.co.uk>To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>Sent: 17/11/2003 22:52Subject: Re: Re[2]: Suggestion on a 2.1 releasedynamic queuing email? whats that?
also, did i hear vustom f1 / f2 / f3 on the cvs log? any docs?
cheers
g
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Linenberg" <elinenbe_at_umich.edu>
To: "Gajdos_at_metatem.net" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Suggestion on a 2.1 release
> I for one would LOVE to see the dynamic playlist viewer, but if it has
> to be put off, then it BETTER be the first feature in the next set of
> daily builds :D (kid)
>
> However, please make sure that the dynamic queuing email is in with
> the documentation. It seems a lot of people do not understand this
> exactly, even though it is one of the best features of rockbox (if not
> the best)... I don't think I could ever get a portable player without
> this type of dynamic file modification -- the only other one that even
> comes close is the rio karma, but that one has so many other bugs...
>
> -e
>
> Gmn> Very good thinking.
> Gmn> I agree.
> Gmn> /JG
>
> Gmn> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 at 15:09, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
> >> I suggest that we package and release EXACTLY what we have now in CVS,
without
> >> waiting for _any_ additional patches. (With the exception of bug
fixes.)
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Life's just a mood ring we're not allowed to see."
They Might Be Giants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface Inspection Ltd
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew |